Review 23: Neuropixels 2.0: A miniaturized high-density probe for stable, long-term brain recordings
Neuropixels 2.0: A miniaturized high-density probe for stable, long-term brain recordings by Nick Steinmetz.
- Paper notes for Neuropixels 2.0
- Notably, this is a pretty big collaboration. The following labs participated:
- O’Keefe Lab at UCL
- Moser Lab at NTNU
- Lee Lab at Janelia Research
- Dudman lab at Janelia Research
- Hausser Lab at UCL
- Steinmetz Lab at UW
- Svoboda Lab at Janelia
- Carandini/ Harris Lab
- Hantman Lab
- Haesler Lab
- Neuropixels new probe :
- has over 5000 sites, features
- has 2 probes and a head stage
- records at 786 sites at once
- weighs over 1 gram
- enables recording from over > 10000 recording sites during free behavior in mice
- Stably recording neurons over days / weeks during long terms processes like learning and memory is challenging, but important for understanding neural coding.
- Many attempts to record from devices that are flexible and less than $\mu$m in size.
- Paper states that downside to these approaches are: make insertion difficult and do not scale at large numbers of recording sites per shank.
- I don’t understand how small flexible devices could make insertion more difficult.
- More rigid and larger devices (Utah array, wire tetrodes, silicon probes) record high-quality signals for 8 weeks. However, no consistent recordings of individual neurons over the scale of months.
- Neuropixels: dense coverage along a line, another array: across a plane.
- algorithm stabilizes device to brain motion post hoc.
- two recording channels be simultaneously recorded in the same channel with noise penalty in snr.
- At this point, I realized that there is a lot of past literature about these recording probes that I am missing. This feels like watching avengers before watching all the prequel movies.
- Results
- 4 shanks, 1280 sites per shank, 5120 total sites.
- single wide band 14-bit data stream.
- Hardware switches can swap recording streams enabling recording from thousands of streams/experiment.
- can cover a plan of 750 x 720 $\mu$m during recording.
- Fig. 1
- Neuropixels 2.0 is much less wide than the previous version.
- Shows LFP recording and spike waveform recording (overlapping channels).
- Probe rasters and reproduced raster of dorsal striatum firing pattern across ten trials.
- 7 / 8 probes recovered in working condition.
- max time recording from implant: 309 days.
- Fig 2.
- the proportion of spikes has a decaying distribution over the # of days after implant. A similar trend is shown in C. and D.
- hippocampus has a high proportion of firing neurons.
- comparison of spike recording stats between labs that used the device.
- I think this plot is hard to interpret because I know there are different conditions for each lab so plot does not necessarily show apples to apples.
- Paper claims brain motion leads to progressively less spikes during the duration of a recording.
- But they have an unsupervised learning algorithm to adjust for motion post hoc and re-detect spikes. This method increases recording stability (3E).
- Fig 3.
- The results from this stabilization procedure a visually very convincing.
- Now they expand the timescale alignment to long intervals.
- successful tracking across days, and weeks (figure 4). 83% tracking accuracy after 9 weeks.
- wonder what that accuracy is across more than three months? But tracking 83% of neurons seems really good.
- Average signals from two sites along a recording line and then decompose them.
- Fig 4
- bank 1 and bank 2 separated to two sets of neurons and the switch helps record mapping between banks using mismatch.
- when both banks are recording noise is lower.
- 3 configurations: both banks on, bank 1 on, bank 2 on.
- Notably, this is a pretty big collaboration. The following labs participated: